Skip to content
Param Veda

Display & Audio

Theme

Font Size

Show/Hide

Audio

Uses your browser’s text-to-speech voices installed on your device. Auto prefers a Sanskrit voice if available.

Dharma Veda · The Architecture of Human Dignity

मर्यादा-रक्षा

maryādā-rakṣā

Official text Sūkta 7 of 18

Mūla · Original verse

Sanskrit

स्वीकृतिं विना स्पर्शो, मानहानिः प्रकीर्तिता । परसीमां विजानीयात्, स्वातन्त्र्यं परिरक्षयेत् ॥
svīkṛtiṃ vinā sparśo, māna-hāniḥ prakīrtitā | para-sīmāṃ vijānīyāt, svātantryaṃ parirakṣayet ||
01

Anvaya

Plain English meaning

Intrusion without consent is recognised as a violation of dignity. Know another’s boundary and protect their freedom.

02

Kāvya

Poetic rendering

Love does not break the door and call the breaking closeness. Respect waits for the free opening of another life.

03

Manana

Contemplation

Consent must be informed, voluntary, specific, comprehensible, and withdrawable. Dependence, fear, intoxication, deception, or power imbalance may make apparent agreement unreliable.

Prayoga

Civilizational practice

Ask rather than assume. Make refusal safe, minimise unnecessary data and access, and stop when consent is withdrawn.

Param Veda Upaniṣad · One-to-One Bhāṣya

Sit near the question

The companion moves from words and meaning to inward reflection, public application, boundaries against misuse, dialogue, and practice.

Padārtha · Key terms

svīkṛti — consent; sparśa — touch or intrusion; maryādā — boundary; para-sīmā — another’s limit; svātantrya — freedom

Anvaya · Sequence of meaning

Intrusion without consent is recognised as a violation of dignity. Know another’s boundary and protect their freedom.

Bhāṣya · Commentary

A human being is not available merely because another desires access. Consent recognises sovereignty over body, information, belief, labour, and intimate life. It is meaningful only when informed, specific, comprehensible, voluntary, and capable of withdrawal without punishment beyond unavoidable consequence.

Loka-saṃgraha · Civilizational application

Institutions must design refusal as a real option. They should minimise unnecessary collection and access, state purpose and duration, protect confidentiality, and account for dependence, age, disability, intoxication, deception, and unequal power. A signed form cannot cleanse coercive conditions.

Maryādā · Boundary against misuse

Consent is not the sole moral standard. A person cannot authorise exploitation that violates another’s rights, and public duties may sometimes justify narrow action without individual consent under law and necessity. Such exceptions carry heightened transparency, proportionality, and review.

Praśna–Uttara

Teacher and student

Questions keep doctrine open to inquiry
Student “Is silence consent?”
Teacher “No, unless a fair and previously understood convention makes it so in a low-risk setting; intimate and high-risk access requires clear agreement.”
Student “Can consent once given last forever?”
Teacher “No. Scope and willingness can change; renewed access requires renewed legitimacy.”

Prayoga · Practice

  1. 1 Make refusal explicit and safe in one process you control.
  2. 2 Collect or retain only the access and data required for the stated purpose.